Organization: FidoNet node 1:107/816 - The Wrong Num, Jersey City NJ
Lines: 29
In a message to All <12 Jan 92 18:42> Redheaded Goddess wrote:
RG> Wrong! The humans have their eyes *closed* and are going
RG> into deeper levels of themselves. My bet is the cat/dog/animals
RG> sense/feel this energy that is expanded/created/evoked within
RG> the human's energy fields and "bask" in it. It can be quite
RG> delightful, being in that sea of bliss, you know.
Basking in another creature's M-field, maybe?
Seriously, animal behavior around sympathetic humans (and human behavior around sympathetic animals) could be due to some kind of receptor-function in our (holographic) brains. We could be picking up pure-animal-comfort from our friendly cats and dogs. But what are they picking up from us? They must like it, they keep coming back...
RG> We are multi-dimensional beings. And if you are going to talk about
RG> ets and aliens, it might be a little wisdom on your part to open
RG> your mind that these ets and aliens do not only exist in the hard
RG> solid core of human/flesh/humanoid bodies..
Evidence seems to indicate that they do exist this way -- at least when they choose to.
Good question. See The Jack the Ripper Casebook by Chief Inspector Donald Rumbelow, re: the 1888 Whitechapel (Ripper) murders.
Whether these sadistic torments have ever been visited on masons in modern times is anyone's guess, I certainly don't know. But several of the Ripper murders involved disembowelment, and one had a message left behind citing the words of the "Jewes" -- the three masons who volunteered to be tortured to death by King Solomon. Rumbelow quotes the relevant part of the oath in his book. Pretty grim stuff.
RG> isic146msu.oscos.montana.edu writes a string of angry
RG> stuff towards me:
RG> Montana: Female PMS? Sounds to me like you have a bad case
RG> of male menopause.
Dementia praecox?
RG> Your grandfather was a 33 degree Mason????? What happened
RG> to *you*?
Perchance a difference of degree, but not of kind? I hear it tends to run in families -- but sometimes skips generations. :-)
RG> I recently found out that these "gruesome" oaths are quite
RG> metaphoric and understanding is reached about them as one
RG> advances (probably in revelation of his inner being).
Let's hope they never are! Last instance I heard of where they were explicitly linked to a crime, the crime was the Ripper murders in London in 1888! See my post to Jim Shaffer. BTW, "Jack the Ripper" was almost certainly Montague Druitt, a ne'er-do-well lawyer from a family of successful surgeons (and freemasons?).
Druitt used his grandfather's postmortem knife (a "ripping knife" in medical parlance) -- the knife was recovered from his office in the Mineries, right by Parliament. It's in the possession of an English lady who was given the knife by an acquaintance of Chief Insp. Allardyne. Druitt was also a *dead ringer* for the Duke of Clarence -- their photos show them to be virtually identical -- thus the rumors over the years that "Eddie" was the Ripper. A constable *talked* to Druitt/"Eddie" less than 50 yards
from the next-to-last murder site in Mitre Square.
RG> And I wasn't the one who brought up the JFK issue.
RG> It is my feeling that there *was* a conspiracy going, but I doubt
RG> very very much that the Masons were behind it.
More like the Mafia (or 50 jealous husbands?). The CIA was forced to help cover it up, simply because the Mafiosi who organized the hit team were all contractors for Project Mongoose -- the plot to assassinate Castro.
After looking at your path, I wonder: Do you work at the Deathstar? If so, what do you think of the Aspect Experiment stuff flying around this echo? Just curious.
f.> Ivan Sanderson yalked about this incident in one of his books - probably
f.> in the sixties. I seem to recall that a marked up copy of the book was
f.> received in the mail by the Defense Department and promptly classified
f.> at a high level.
f.> Does anybody remember anything like this?
I do. Jessup's book (with colored annotations by "Carl Allende") was reproduced in 5-color mimeograph by the ONR in the 1950s. Several of these mimeographs were subsequently leaked, and Gray Barker published an edition in color. Unfortunately I don't have a copy but Dr. Sanderson did.
f.> I don't have the Sanderson book.
Me neither, just a few highly treasured issues of Pursuit.
>>Ryk Spoor writes: "if they (meaning the ets) don't exist
>>on the real plane, then talking about them is futile."
>>
You're at U. of Pittsburgh, and you *really* believe this??!
RES> If *I* can't detect them, then
RES> whatever "reality" they exist in has no
RES> contact with mine, and therefore does
RES> not matter. This IS the only real plane
RES> FOR HUMAN BEINGS. We exist on this
RES> earth, in this spacetime. Any others that
RES> can't contact ours in a meaningful,
RES> detectable way might as well not exist.
"Why should we have anything to do with this guy Columbus?"
"We live in Europe, and we can't see *anything* when we look west. If there's anything there, we have no contact with it, and therefore it does not matter. Europe is the only REAL place for HUMAN BEINGS. Anyone else who can't contact us in a meaningful way might as well not exist. Besides, if we try to go there, we'll fall off the earth if the Sea Monsters don't get us first."
RES> Sure, they might be there, but then it's the same as looking at the blank
RES> sheet of paper; yep, it might well be a
RES> picture of a polar bear in a blizzard,
RES> but if I can't tell the difference then it remains a blank sheet of paper.
In the words of the First Caliph of Alexandria: "If all these books support the Koran, then the Koran is enough. If any of these books gainsay the Koran, then they *deserve* to be burned anyway."
The Caliph then burned tens of thousands of classical and ancient manuscripts contained in the entire Library of Alexandria, ca. 880 A.D. 3,000 years of scholarship, history, medicine and literature heated the entire city for the whole winter.
RES> If you can't SHOW it to me, in some form or other, then it can't
RES> be REALITY; it can only be an opinion or a philosophy that has no more
RES> validity than a billion others... and consequently little utility.
Somehow I get the impression that you wouldn't believe it if you saw it. Are you familiar with the theories of Sheldrake and Bohm? If so, what do you think of them?
In article <103783.297D26B6@paranet.FIDONET.ORG> Clark.Matthews@f816.n107.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Clark Matthews) writes:
You know, responses like the following really make me wonder if anyone
READS the posts I make, or just says "ah. He disagrees. I'll find one line
of thought that I can make fun of, since I can't rationally ARGUE with him."
But onward into the fray...
>"Why should we have anything to do with this guy Columbus?"
>
>"We live in Europe, and we can't see *anything* when we look west. If there's anything there, we have no contact with it, and therefore it does not matter. Europe is the only REAL place for HUMAN BEINGS. Anyone else who can't contact us in a meaningful
> way might as well not exist. Besides, if we try to go there, we'll fall off the earth if the Sea Monsters don't get us first."
Now, if you'd look back, the posts were dealing with assertions of ETs
contacting us. If ETs chose to contact us, they should be leaving measurable,
verifiable traces of their existence.
In the Columbus example above, the existence, or lack thereof, of
any other contactable place is verifiable. To make the analogy closer,
assume that Columbus had been contacted telepathically by Indians and
said he was going over there. In this case, he could use physical means to
verify his otherwise vaporous claims. By the same token, IF there are energy-
beings contacting people through mental means, they can be proven to exist
because they must leave some traces in the real world.
>
> RES> Sure, they might be there, but then it's the same as looking at the blank
> RES> sheet of paper; yep, it might well be a
> RES> picture of a polar bear in a blizzard,
> RES> but if I can't tell the difference then it remains a blank sheet of paper.
>
>In the words of the First Caliph of Alexandria: "If all these books support the Koran, then the Koran is enough. If any of these books gainsay the Koran, then they *deserve* to be burned anyway."
>
>The Caliph then burned tens of thousands of classical and ancient manuscripts contained in the entire Library of Alexandria, ca. 880 A.D. 3,000 years of scholarship, history, medicine and literature heated the entire city for the whole winter.
Hmm. Now equating me with a bookburner and a close-minded religious
fanatic.
Look, jack, PROOF is all I need. I'm willing to believe in ANYTHING
if someone can show PROOF.
Redheaded Goddess and you are both making rather nasty attacks on
my supposed close-minded nature, while none of you appear capable of being
able to understand the simple fact that REALITY can be DEMONSTRATED. If
you believe you are in contact with aliens or have strange supernatural
powers or are Channeling information from future people, there are a hundred
ways to PROVE it to me... and not ONE of you has shown the slightest
inclination to do so.
>
> RES> If you can't SHOW it to me, in some form or other, then it can't
> RES> be REALITY; it can only be an opinion or a philosophy that has no more
> RES> validity than a billion others... and consequently little utility.
>
>Somehow I get the impression that you wouldn't believe it if you saw it. Are you familiar with the theories of Sheldrake and Bohm? If so, what do you think of them?
I would be able to believe anything I was shown. I have the training
and the ability to test any evidence you care to send my way. But it has to
be EVIDENCE. Not anecdotes, not comments from channelers, not a "feeling".
Solid, hard evidence. Believe you have telepathy? Fine. Read my mind and
tell me something that no one but me knows. Believe you have contact with
aliens? Fine. Get something other than fuzzy philosophy out of them, get
them to tell you some major scientific point that can be verified here.
Believe in past lives? Okay. Ask the person something testable, for
example, find someone whose past life gave them access to knowledge
of the location of some lost work of art or treasure. Then go find it.
If you believe in precognition, go win the lottery tomorrow. And the next
day, and the next. If you believe you are channeling thoughts from
people from the future, get exact stock quotes for 20 stocks for the next
three weeks.
There are a thousand ways to prove ANY assertions you make... IF
RH> My impression of the star map is that one could probably find a good match
RH> between *any* set of points drawn on paper and an actual star field, if
RH> one looked hard enough. On the other hand, this is the only solid match
RH> that's ever been found (there is one in Fuller's book, but it's way off.)
RH> I'd like to hear from a statistician on this point in particular, but if
RH> anyone has further information on the analysis of the map, feel free to
RH> jump in.
Hello Ron. The star map that closely matched the Hill description is the Fish Map. It was created by Marjorie Fish, as you described, in the mid-70s.
As to alternative interpretations, I believe there are/were two. Both involved the assumption that the map described by Betty Hill involved "forced perspective", e.g., the "double-star" in the foreground isn't an actual double star, but a perspective showing a "home star" in the foreground and a near neighbor in the near distance.
One of the alternative maps has the aliens coming from Tau Ceti. Interestingly, all three more-or-less plausible maps include Tau Ceti.
RG> Clark Matthews writes to me something about Deathstar...
RG> What is Deathstar?
Holmdel? Or do I misread your path line?
RG> As far as your comments about Jack the Ripper being a Mason..
RG> well, there are crazy people in all walks of life...if he was
RG> a Mason this does not mean this is the typical thing that
RG> Masons do.
Sorry if I alarmed you. Let me make it explicitly clear that I don't think the Whitechapel murders were "typical Masonic behavior" either. But the graffiti scrawled near one of the last victims was unquestionably Masonic. It's one of the most interesting aspects of the case and it spawned a lot of the occult theories about the crimes.
I only brought this up in the context of some flames from a hydrophobic fellow whose grandad was a Mason, or something. Sorry if I confused the issue.
RG> Clark Matthews writes good retort to Ryk spoor about
RG> Columbus, Europe, etc.
RG> Good post, Clark. I applaud you.
Thanks!
RG> If they don't see it, they not only don't believe it, it
RG> must certainly mean that it doesn't exist, right? WRONG.
I think so. I think serious UFO research requires an insistance on evidence, critical thinking, and imagination. The character who wrote that Snopes Post seems to lack all three.
Depressing to see stuff like that coming out of a college.
Best,
Clark
RG> :-)
RG> Kathy
RG> --- ConfMail V4.00
RG> * Origin: Paranet(sm) - The world's leading UFO Investigative
JS> I didn't hear a single word about this. One of the stations had rapidly
JS> dismissed the initial sightings (or I should say "sighting"; they didn't
JS> say anything about "approximately 20 objects") as a C-130. The other
JS> stations simply said that the FAA didn't know what it was, and let the
JS> matter drop. (The station claiming it
JS> was a C-130 said that it was cleared
JS> to fly on a regular schedule or some such thing, so it didn't have to
JS> notify them when it took off. Are such things done?)
Jim! Have you been following the FAA discussions on ParaNet?
Look -- here's our chance to GET FAA TRACKING TAPES before they erase them! They're supposed to KEEP THE TAPES FOR 15 DAYS before bulking them -- so regardless of what they *say* about what it was, or wasn't, the tapes of the local air traffic should be extant.
RES> READS the posts I make, or just says "ah. He disagrees. I'll find one line
RES> of thought that I can make fun of, since
RES> I can't rationally ARGUE with him."
RES> But onward into the fray...
I did not write the above. I wrote this...
>>"Why should we have anything to do with this guy Columbus?"
>>
>>"We live in Europe, and we can't see *anything* when we look
... etc., etc. I don't mind being quoted & ridiculed, as long I'm being quoted. Now, to this ...
RES> Now, if you'd look back, the
RES> posts were dealing with assertions of ETs
RES> contacting us. If ETs chose to contact
RES> us, they should be leaving measurable,
RES> verifiable traces of their existence.
I wish you'd said so. You wrote vividly that you hadn't seen any evidence, didn't care to see any evidence, didn't want to see any evidence, and basically weren't interested in any evidence for UFOs. I think you made yourself quite clear & I freely quoted the first Caliph of Alexandria because he was the most outlandish philistine I could think of on short notice. My remarks have no religious significance at all -- the guy was simply a blinkered ignoramus of gigantic proportions. Sorry if it bothered y
ou -- go back & read what I was responding to, though.
As to channeling, I agree with you. I think channeling is a crock & it's totally screwed up this echo. If you want to see evidence for UFOs, I'd suggest picking up Night Seige by Phil Imbrogno. Or, by the sound of things, you might just drive up to Scranton some night and watch the skies...
If you think alternate realities are a fantasy, please tell me why electrons require a 720-degree spin to complete one rotation.
RES> In the Columbus example above, the existence, or lack thereof, of
RES> any other contactable place is verifiable. To make the analogy closer,
RES> assume that Columbus had been contacted telepathically by Indians and
RES> said he was going over there. In this case, he could use physical means to
RES> verify his otherwise vaporous claims. By
Wrong. Columbus is said to have seen two dead American Indians in a dugout canoe, near Iceland. Like most European sailors, he saw unusual flotsam in the Gulf Stream, including branches, driftwood, dead animals, etc. Indeed Columbus altered his mathematics to match his observations, actually reasoning (incorrectly) that his navigational minutes had to be smaller than the (mathematically certain) navigational minutes dictated by mathematicans and mapmakers as far back as Ptolemy.
RES> the same token, IF there are energy-
RES> beings contacting people through mental
RES> means, they can be proven to exist
RES> because they must leave some traces in the real world.
I agree, but I would allow that "energy beings" or at least beings capable of travelling dimensionally *would perhaps have some difficulty* in leaving such traces, due to the nature of their means of transport. It's a little like expecting "lasting impressions" from recorded music from a CD -- holograms don't leave footprints. I don't know for certain, of course. But at least I'll consider the possibility...
>> RES> Sure, they might be there, but then it's the same as
RES> looking at the blank
>> RES> sheet of paper; yep, it might well be a
>> RES> picture of a polar bear in a blizzard,
>> RES> but if I can't tell the difference then it remains a blank
RES> sheet of paper.
Until you devise a test to see the polar bear. I'd suggest looking for a heat signature.
The point is to test, not scoff.
RES> Hmm. Now equating me with a
RES> bookburner and a close-minded religious
RES> fanatic.
Sorry. As I said above, I didn't mean to tar you with a broad brush with the Caliph thing. Closed-mindedness was what I was trying to illustrate, nothing more.
RES> Look, jack, PROOF is all I
RES> need. I'm willing to believe in ANYTHING
RES> if someone can show PROOF.
Ryk, if I could show you conclusive proof I would be a happy man. Some of the best minds around are grappling with the UFO phenomenon -- and many of the rest of the folks interested in this have sunk into New-Age Channeled cryptobabble. No other subject today has a broader spectrum of scholarship & belief than UFOs (with the possible exception of JFK-assassination theories).
If you're really interested, check out Imbrogno's book & follow your interest from there.
RES> none of you appear capable of being
RES> able to understand the simple fact that REALITY can be DEMONSTRATED. If
Sure! No arguement there. I would point out that old Ptolemy could demonstrate a reality that worked very convincingly and accurately. The Sun revolved around the Earth, of course -- but it worked.
We may not understand everything, you see. We definitely don't understand what we *don't* see. Like ~50% of the matter in the universe -- the dark matter. Is it there? Is it in black holes? Does it have a different "spin"? Does it comprise an alternate universe? A parallel universe? I'd sure like to know.
RES> you believe you are in contact with aliens or have strange supernatural
RES> powers or are Channeling information
RES> from future people, there are a hundred
RES> ways to PROVE it to me... and not ONE of you has shown the slightest
RES> inclination to do so.
I don't channel & don't mess with it. Aliens avoid me (The heartbreak of psoriasis??? Beats me...) I don't recall saying that I did any of the things you mention.
RES> If you can't SHOW it to me, in some form or other, then it can't
RES> be REALITY; it can only be an opinion or a philosophy that has no more
RES> validity than a billion others... and consequently little utility.
"If the Koran is sufficient..."
>>Somehow I get the impression that you wouldn't believe it if you
RES> saw it. Are you familiar with the theories of Sheldrake and
RES> Bohm? If so, what do you think of them?
RES> I would be able to believe
RES> anything I was shown. I have the training
RES> and the ability to test any evidence
RES> you care to send my way. But it has to
RES> be EVIDENCE. Not anecdotes, not
RES> comments from channelers, not a "feeling".
Look, I know you're probably steamed, but I must repeat my questions: Are you familiar with the theories of Sheldrake and Bohm? If so, what do you think of them?
If not, check them out. Examine the data, the repetitions, confirmations, anomalies, etc. If you're intrigued, devise a new experiment & try it. The theories of these two men deal with a holographic paradigm for both matter and thought. Have a look at Paul Pietsch's _Shufflebrain_ .
RES> Solid, hard evidence. Believe you have telepathy? Fine. Read my mind
Recently a man in California caught on video two F-16's being swallowed by what appeared to be a UFO. The man is currently selling the video (Or has sold) to television stations around the world. Apparently Unsolved Mystries has purchased the video -- ??
Also, I need to know this:
What government agenices are currently investigating UFO crashes etc. What is the agency called that keeps track of all the abductions.
Has anyone heard of the FEMA cover-up? This too would also be a big help.
BTW, I think this is a great forum for discussion, but, too bad everything one says is being monitored by dozens of federal agencies. Esp. on this newsgroup.
ALSO, Scott and the Red-head, take your discussion else where -- I'm getting tierd of reading the BS that is being sent out.
Organization: FidoNet node 1:107/816 - The Wrong Num, Jersey City NJ
Lines: 26
In a message to Clark Matthews <27 Jan 92 00:13> Jim Shaffer wrote:
JS> That was a good idea, but I wish one of us would've had it a
JS> little sooner. If my memory serves, the first sighting was on the
JS> 8th or 9th, so those tapes are probably gone, and I doubt there'd
JS> be time to get through the paperwork etc. for the second sighting.
JS> (Remember, I didn't even know there *was* more than one sighting
JS> until a few days ago.)
Hi Jim!
Well, let's both keep this possibility in mind for future sightings, shall we? Hopefully the others on this net will do likewise.
The idea of the FAA denying UFO echos on their radar and then blithely bulk erasing their tapes in two weeks really gets my dander up. Assuming they actually *do* erase such tapes, which I highly doubt.
Reminds me of Jacques Vallee's numbing experience as a boy-astronomer, doesn't it? In his first job out of college, he saw his superiors examine tapes that showed a UFO. They erased them as fast as they could. Vive la France!
Subject: Two IECEC Papers by T.E. Bearden posted to sci.physics and a.s.p.n.
Summary: Physics unification theory (with exptl. support) may have, if proven correct, revolutionary impacts on energy, environment, military, aeronautics, space travel, engineering, etc.
JN> I just posted to sci.physics and alt.sci.physics.new-theories two papers by
JN> Mr. Tom E. Bearden (with his permission)
JN> which appeared in the Proceedings of
JN> the 26th Intersociety Energy Conversion
JN> Engineering Conference, August 4-9,
JN> 1991, Boston, Massachusetts. They can be found in volume 4 in the section
JN> entitled 'Advanced Energy Concepts'. The titles are
Thanks for the source info, Jon! I didn't see the actual papers on the ParaNet part of this conference -- any possibility of your reposting them?
I've read much of Bearden's earlier work and look forward to seeing him here! Is he still at the Redstone Arsenal? Or has he moved on to other projects?
Subject: Two IECEC Papers by T.E. Bearden posted to sci.physics and a.s.p.n.
Summary: Physics unification theory (with exptl. support) may have, if proven correct, revolutionary impacts on energy, environment, military, aeronautics, space travel, engineering, etc.
Organization: FidoNet node 2:245/10 - FidoNet Berli, Berlin 41
Lines: 23
Hallo David!
In a msg of <31 Jan 92>, David Jones writes to All:
DJ> Last Tuesday evening, KSBW, Channel 8 TV, in Salinas, CA, reported
DJ> that a dozen people saw several extraterrestrial spacecraft
DJ> outside of Paso Robles, CA, towards the area of San Louis Obispo. One
DJ> of the craft landed and a couple of grey aliens got out and walked
DJ> around, returned to their craft, and then flew off.
DJ> Why wasn't this historic occasion reported internationally?
DJ> Extraterrestrials are here! Why the coverup? Why does the
DJ> national news media have their heads in the sand? We need to know the
DJ> truth, NOW!
Did you read the document "MJ-12" from Cooper? Very interesting, but I can't belive all of this. Some of MJ-12, the theory of the greys and the connections between CIA and international drugs mafia (Cooper says, CIA is the drugs mafia) to finance the grey-alien-bases in New Mexico and Nevada are possible.
In article <108652.29961E85@paranet.FIDONET.ORG> Marc.Mueller@f10.n245.z2.FIDONET.ORG (Marc Mueller) writes:
>Did you read the document "MJ-12" from Cooper? Very interesting, but I can't belive all of this. Some of MJ-12, the theory of the greys and the connections between CIA and international drugs mafia (Cooper says, CIA is the drugs mafia) to finance the grey-alien-bases in New Mexico and Nevada are possible.
>
>PS: The Cooper-document is from may 23,1989
>
I read that document last year.....some of it sounded quite scary(if it's true)
Is there anybody out there who can answer any of these questions :
Is this cooper document authentic?
Also what has happened to him for the past two years?
Has he any plans to do any seminar's in Europe?
Has anybody purchased the JFK video from bill cooper?
Is there any FTP sites where I can grab more info on this subject?
Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
Lines: 24
In article <108652.29961E85@paranet.FIDONET.ORG> Marc.Mueller@f10.n245.z2.FIDONET.ORG (Marc Mueller) writes:
>
>Did you read the document "MJ-12" from Cooper? Very interesting, but I can't belive all of this. Some of MJ-12, the theory of the greys and the connections between CIA and international drugs mafia (Cooper says, CIA is the drugs mafia) to finance the grey-alien-bases in New Mexico and Nevada are possible.
>
>PS: The Cooper-document is from may 23,1989
>
It's true! I live in New Mexico and have been buying controlled
substances from grey-aliens for years! I always thought the best pot was from
Colorado, but then these guys turned me on to some shit that was OUT OF THIS
WORLD! They also have their own special formula for LSD that makes everyone
look like Ricky Ricardo. (They once told me something about Ricky and the CIA
but I was too stoned to care. Maybe it was about Ricky and Senator McCarthy.
In article <108652.29961E85@paranet.FIDONET.ORG> Marc.Mueller@f10.n245.z2.FIDONET.ORG (Marc Mueller) writes:
>Did you read the document "MJ-12" from Cooper? Very interesting, but I can't belive all of this. Some of MJ-12, the theory of the greys and the connections between CIA and international drugs mafia (Cooper says, CIA is the drugs mafia) to finance the grey
>-alien-bases in New Mexico and Nevada are possible.
And the phone company uses Third World babies to make memory chips.
--
jcj@tellabs.com
My dog was channeling Lassie last night, but I don't give